“NATO’s New Neighbor: Russian Nukes in Belarus”
Russian Nuclear Weapons Deployed Near NATO’s Borders Following Belarus’ Hosting Decision
In a significant development, Russia has followed through on its pledge to relocate a portion of its nuclear arsenal to Belarus, effectively stationing Russian-controlled nuclear weaponry in close proximity to NATO’s territories.
President Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus has cited Poland’s perceived aggression as the driving force behind his nation’s decision to accommodate these nuclear weapons. Over the past fourteen days, Poland’s Prime Minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, positioning himself as a stalwart figure in national security in the lead-up to the forthcoming October elections, has deployed a substantial number of troops to the border. This move has contributed to heightened tensions due to the increased troop presence.
However, both Russia and Belarus are unlikely to provoke the ire of NATO without careful consideration. Experts suggest that the transfer of nuclear armaments “seems more indicative of a show of strength towards Western nations rather than actual preparations for their deployment,” as elucidated by Alex Brideau, Head of Europe at Eurasia Group.
While NATO’s Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, has criticized Moscow’s actions, analysts like Brideau believe that President Joe Biden’s response holds paramount importance, particularly in the eyes of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Since the invasion in February 2022, Washington’s reactions have been circumspect. Concrete actions from the US government concerning the Russian regime’s threats regarding nuclear armament deployment or utilization have been relatively scarce.
Simultaneously, the US Embassy issued a security advisory, urging American citizens present in Belarus to expeditiously depart the country. This step seems driven by escalating tensions within the region rather than the nuclear developments. Observers are keen to ascertain whether Russia’s recent maneuver will prompt President Biden to adopt a more robust stance in his rhetoric.